Sex Trafficking and the New Abolitionists: A Panel Discussion at Brooklyn Museum

@xxdiogenescynicxx After a year long nationwide police operation, they found no sex slaves, so it is a real stretch to claim there are any, never mind to claim there are 80,000, as the government has. Clearly, the ‘sex slave’ industry, DOES NOT EXIST.

There are some people, who enjoy sticking hamsters up there bottoms, or having sex with mud sharks. There are other people, who enjoy hammering their nutsacks to a sideboard – but not enough of them, to justify hundreds of millions of government expenditure to cure the problem. NO SEX SLAVES WERE FOUND. Do you think the police have been told to cover up for ‘sex slaves’ because of some corruption or other? Show the evidence. Victim-feminists are the ones covering up, for their big, stinky, lie.

@xxdiogenescynicxx So we regulate and heavily tax prostitution, making it a much less profitable business to be in, and use the money to educate women about the importance of choosing non-sex work related professions to achieve maximum life satisfaction, and for the greater good of society, including, the importance of not being a lazy gold digger, or useless housewhore. I heard the latest US census lumped housewife into the same category as beggar and prostitute – which is totally on the money!

Correction: It was the Indian census. None of that stuff you’ve listed counts as real work, which is why women insist so vehemently that it is THEIR work. If it is work, then why do women gatekeep it all so aggressively? Because they know it is far more emotionally rewarding than working for a boss in a faceless corporation just to meet some profit margin, wheras caring for the house you live in, and the children who are your off-spring, brings far more satisfaction – so no, NOT work dear.

@xxdiogenescynicxx because legal and cultural structures are set up to encourage women to do it, and because women tend to get their way in marriages. Women tell men to leave the house, and they can do this verbally, but also non-verbally, it has been found. Research shows more men say they would like to stay home more, than women say they would like men to stay home. Also, women will say one thing, but behave in a different way, like saying they don’t go for rich men, whilst going for rich men

Any time you hear a victim-feminist claiming that some gender dynamic or other is natural, then you can be absolutely certain they are attempting to gatekeep a female privilege. Men desiring women’s beauty has nothing to do with women desiring men’s money. You are conflating aesthetic desire, with the prostitution ethic. Women desire men for their beauty too. Unfortunately the culture (including you) encourages women to be whores, by placating their gold digging ways, with such lame excuses.

@xxdiogenescynicxx The trouble is, women know, that when they find one of these provider-type men, they can look forward to orgasm after fake orgasm, It’s nature’s way of saying ‘Get as job, you whore!’ Close your eyes (if female) and imagine some slavish sap in a tie, handing you the keys to a new Volvo. It leaves the old vulva stone cold. Also, new research shows lower IQ women are bigger gold diggers than higher IQ women, and that gold digging is a strategy – for the stupid! Understand?

I’m not anti-feminist (Where did you get that idea?) I’m anti VICTIM-feminist, and I personally maintain there is a difference. I realize there is a concerted effort by feministing et al, to redifine feminism as the insistence that women are the oppressed sex, but real feminism has always really been about women realizing the equal opportunities they now have, and getting on with it. I’m all for women taking jobs from men, who do too much work as it is. Women are too often the redundant sex.